GMAT 考满分题库

Magoosh - 逻辑CR - 164
Nutritionist: Your company's fruit-processing technologies add unacceptable amounts of copper to the orange juice you sell. Because copper blocks the absorption of Vitamin C, your advertising campaign claiming that your juice is a good source of Vitamin C is faulty and should be removed.

Juice Manufacturer: Some amount of copper is necessary for optimal health. Recent studies have shown that as many as 25 percent of Americans do not get enough copper in their diets; therefore, the benefits of the copper that our process adds to the juice outweigh the costs of any Vitamin C that it may block.

The juice manufacturer's response is flawed as a refutation of the nutritionist's argument because it
  • Arelies on the unfounded assumption that copper may be as good for health as Vitamin C. 分析该选项
  • Bdoes not address the issue of whether sufficient amounts of copper are present to invalidate its advertising claims. 分析该选项
  • Cfails to describe how much Vitamin C the juice company adds to each bottle, as stated in the advertising campaign, and how much is blocked from absorption by copper. 分析该选项
  • Daddresses the nutritionist's argument in general terms, rather than in terms of the health of individuals. 分析该选项
  • Eshows that the nutritionist's evidence about copper is irrelevant but fails to demonstrate any flaws in the nutritionist's assumptions. 分析该选项
显示答案
正确答案: B

讨论题目 或 发起提问

|

题目讨论

  • 按热度
  • 按顺序

最新提问